Posted on January 29, 2014. Filed under: collaboration, communications, communities, community, corporate communications, digital workplace, internal communications, intranet, organisational culture, social intranet, social media, social networking, Uncategorized | Tags: conversation, internal comms, internal communications, internal communications 2.0, intranet, social organisation |
John is a press officer in the media relations team at Blah Blah plc. Like John, most of his peers are ex-journalists. They all started their careers in local newspapers, writing about village fêtes, lawn mower thefts from back yards, court news and their local football team. One by one, they all got promoted and specialised in a particular field and covered a larger patch, before moving to regional media outlets and finally on to the nationals. John worked for ten years at a popular national tabloid newspaper.
John and his colleagues all progressed based on the quality of their end product – articles; broadcast media segments – essentially, a presentation of some kind. The quality of their end product depends upon things like: how good their sources are; how skilled they are at writing and crafting narrative; their research skills; and also their instinct for sniffing out as good story.
Then one day, John saw a job advert for a press officer at Blah Blah plc. It offered a better salary and benefits, more secure employment and a far less claustrophobic/nepotistic culture. So he applied, got the job and made the switch from journalist to spokesperson.
John soon found out that, while all his old journalistic skills are still very valuable in his new role, success is measured very differently. The output or end product of John’s labours shifted from being a presentation for a mass audience to his ability to influence a much smaller set of identifiable individuals. So the presentation subtly shifts from being an end in itself to a means to an end. That end being influence.
So, what’s all this got to do with internal comms? I believe the journey that John has undertaken above, is exactly the same journey that we as internal communicators must now make to remain effective in a social organisation – by which I mean an organisation with internal systems which support commenting and conversation and which are used widely by employees.
In organisations which are strongly hierarchical and where on-line, social engagement functionality is not available, employee communications is highly managed, structured and controlled. What employee comms people produce in these types of organisations is well crafted presentational material – be it a news item or a communication from the CEO or senior manager. This is akin to journalism inside.
As an organisation introduces functionality which supports connection and conversation, employee comms people need to compete with other information providers to attract attention to their content through the noise. This will never be achieved by continuing to produce corporate presentational material – however well crafted. The conversation around a piece of content, which creates context and brings it to life becomes, arguably, more important than the original content itself. Influence comes from being part of that conversation and change happens as a result of it.
Being part of the conversation, explaining – sometimes defending - the company’s position to employees and trying to influence behaviours is much more akin to being a spokesperson for your organisation, inside your organisation. This means no more hiding behind a wall of content and being invisible to employees. It means stepping in to the limelight, being the most connected person in your organisation and discussing openly and honestly the messages you have been tasked with delivering and describing and exhibiting the behaviours you are trying to promote. It also means being accountable in a much more transparent way than we have ever had to be before.
Pretty scary? Certainly. Very exciting? Definitely!
The great news is that, as employee comms people, we already have a fantastic set of skills to help us flourish in this new environment. All we need to do shift our thinking. There really has never been a more exciting time to be in employee comms … and a social organisation is the perfect environment for us to flourish and grow.Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Posted on January 15, 2014. Filed under: communications, corporate communications, internal communications, intranet, organisational culture, social intranet | Tags: employee engagement, engagement, internal comms, internal communications, value |
In the world of internal communications we seem to spend our time tumbling or lurching from one activity (aka crisis!) to another. We don’t often spend time reflecting on what we’re really contributing, or our purpose inside organisations. This is a shame. It’s also very tiring as without a clear purpose we’re not always in a position to say: “NO”
So, I decided to spend a little time thinking about the purpose and value of internal communications inside organisations to reset and recalibrate my thinking. Below are some random meanderings on the subject.
What’s the point of internal comms?
I think internal comms is an invaluable organisational asset … and here’s why. Organisations are just groups of people. Both organisations as entities and people as individuals have needs. For example, an organisation needs to produce the stuff its customers want as efficiently and cheaply as possible … and people want to feel valued, respected and heard. Internal communications blends the needs of the organisation with the needs of its people so that stuff gets produced and the people enjoy producing it. Internal communications holds the organisational space. And, when the organisational needs change to meet the demands of its customers or the markets, internal communications helps people through that change so that everyone’s needs are still being met at the end of it.
In good organisations with successful internal communications teams, every employee believes they can make a difference … and, crucially, wants to make a difference.
What does internal comms do?
A very good question. Below is a rough sketch of what I think constitutes the internal communications core process:
In my experience, we’re not very good at the first step in this process – agreeing objectives. These need to be crystal clear and they need to be outcomes rather than outputs. As a profession, we have a bad reputation for measuring our outputs and equating the scale of these outputs with success.
What does good look like?
I think a healthy internal communications ecosystem looks something like this:
It should be a healthy balance of: stuff (collectively described in this diagram as ‘content’) -> getting to the right people in a timely fashion -> creating conversation -> which helps inform the next load of stuff … and so it goes on. Traditionally, we have been poor at the conversation bit of this which I think has limited the value we’ve delivered as a profession. However, with the advent of the so called social organisation, this is all changing. Once we’ve got this all ticking along nicely we can be assured that we all have a shared understanding of what is required, we feel engaged and change happens. If only it was that simple!
A bit more about value
Wow … this is really tricky! Effective internal comms is about doing some stuff (service delivery); forming relationships with stakeholders to help them solve their business problems (business partnering); and amazing the business with new and exciting thinking (leading change … aka innovating). Here’s a little diagram showing these activities which I’ve chosen to call the value triangle:
A good internal comms practitioner will need to do all of these things at various times … the trick is getting the balance right. I think the right balance is illustrated by the triangular shape of the model.
I don’t really have one. As I said at the start, these are fairly random meanderings which have helped me think about what I should be doing and how to balance the various activities/priorities demanded of me. One day, I plan to say “NO” to something. When I do, you’ll be the first to know!
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Posted on January 14, 2014. Filed under: communications, corporate communications, digital workplace, internal communications, intranet, organisational culture, social intranet | Tags: Augustus Gloop, BT, BT Intranet, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, future of internal communications, internal comms, IntraTeam, IntraTeam Conference |
The A303 is a road which runs from the affluent, urban, south of England to the beautiful, rural, south west of England – the latter, a region which conjures up for many English people long, hot, summer holidays by the sea. I’m sure many countries have an equivalent road. But surely, only in England, would someone actually write a book about such a road … and only English people would surely buy it in their thousands! I surprised myself by being one of them … reading it and really enjoying it.
Anyway, about halfway along the A303 – highway to the sun (<- the author’s description, not mine!) – lies a pile of prehistoric stones called Stonehenge, described as one of the ‘wonders of the world’. Frankly, it’s a pretty disappointing wonder of the world compared to some of the others littering the globe but, nonetheless, it has for hundreds of years been the meeting place at the Summer Solstice for various groups who purport to worship the sun or feel the urge to commune with their ancestors. The most famous of these groups is The Stonehenge Druids.
Every year on 21 June at sunrise, the Druids, accompanied by various pagans and occultists are drawn to Stonehenge to do their thing – they just can’t help themselves. Similarly, in the midst of winter in the dark and distant land of Denmark (<- unless you live there or near it … in which case it’s near and dark), an equally strange group of misfits gathers each year to commune with one another at the ancient ceremony (<- by conference standards at least) of IntraTeam. They just can’t help themselves!
As well as being part of the odd group of people who read books about roads, this year, I’m also one of the strange misfits gravitating to IntraTeam in Copenhagen in February. I haven’t spoken at any conferences for some time because, to be frank, in most cases there isn’t much in it for me. IntraTeam is different though. Without wishing to compromise my normally cool and calm image … I’m like Augustus Gloop in the Chocolate Factory! The riches on display are breath-taking.
I fully intend to gorge myself until I’m fit to burst … and really hope you can make it too!
In case you’re interested, I’m presenting on how to be an effective internal communicator and remain relevant in a social organisation. Between now and the conference, I hope to publish some posts giving a flavour of what I’ll present … well hope springs eternal!Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Dear Senior Manager – please play nicely in our social channels #internalcomms #intranet #socialmedia
Posted on October 11, 2012. Filed under: communications, corporate communications, digital workplace, internal communications, intranet, leadership, organisational culture, social intranet, social media | Tags: internal comms, internal communications, senior manager communications, social media |
If I had to give a senior manager a bit of advice about how to be successful in using social channels on our intranet, it would be something like this:
The critical success factor for engaging in a social channel as a senior manager is getting the tone of your engagement right. You need to ensure that you maintain the right balance between being authoritative as a senior manager and being an individual engaging in a conversation with another individual. Influence in social channels is something you earn over time by engaging in the right way and not something automatically conferred upon you because of your role in the organisation.
Influence comes from being part of the conversation, not part of the establishment.
It is also important to accept that your people need to collaborate in social channels to be effective in their jobs – they need to trust that you endorse this activity and that they are not being judged negatively for being active participants. Your early interactions, as a senior manager, will be critical to the health of social collaboration by your people going forward.
The following points should help you find the right tone in your responses. When responding to an individual in a social channel, you should never:
- preach at them or talk down to them
- hide behind quotes from company literature or use management speak as a surrogate for authentic engagement
- use jargon, abbreviations and marketing/business language
- throw your weight around and act in a heavy handed manner because of your position in the company.
You should always:
- listen first
- be honest, open and authentic in all your responses – which includes owning up to mistakes as quickly as possible
- deal with negative sentiment head on – ignoring negative sentiment inevitably results in it spiralling out of control – remember … negative sentiment almost always comes from an un-met need which you can probably meet
- stick around and follow-up on comments you might make in a given conversation – making a comment and then leaving is not engaging in a conversation.
Posted on July 17, 2012. Filed under: collaboration, communications, corporate communications, internal communications, intranet, social intranet | Tags: future of employee communications, future of internal communications, internal comms, internal communications |
This is a bit of a basic diagram, but something like this I think:Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )
Posted on September 28, 2011. Filed under: collaboration, communications, communities, community, corporate communications, digital workplace, in conversation, internal communications, intranet, leadership, organisational culture, social intranet, social media | Tags: BT, BT Intranet, culture, In conversation, organisational culture, Red Sky Vision, Richard Dennison, social media, video |
The fourth in the series of in conversation with Red Sky Vision talking about social media and corporate culture. It’s quite long (6 mins: 53 sec) but I think it’s quite interesting (I would wouldn’t I ).Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )
Posted on August 24, 2011. Filed under: collaboration, communications, corporate communications, digital workplace, in conversation, internal communications, intranet, organisational culture, social intranet, social media, Uncategorized, Web 2.0 | Tags: In conversation, internal comms, Red Sky Vision, Richard Dennison |
The third in the series of in conversation with Red Sky Vision talking about the impact of social media on internal communications. The conversation weaves around the changing role of internal comms and how and why internal comms people can thrive in the social space.Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 3 so far )
Posted on August 22, 2011. Filed under: BT case study, collaboration, communications, communities, community, corporate communications, digital workplace, governance, in conversation, internal communications, intranet, knowledge, organisational culture, social intranet, social media, social networking, Uncategorized, Web 2.0 | Tags: BT Intranet, In conversation, intranet, Red Sky Vision, Richard Dennison, social intranet, Web 2.0 |
The second in the series of in conversations with Red Sky Vision – this time a short sound bite or two about why we introduced social media onto the BT Intranet (this one is much shorter … only 1 min 20 sec ).Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Posted on June 20, 2011. Filed under: BT case study, communications, corporate communications, internal communications, intranet, organisational culture, social intranet, social media, social media guidelines, Uncategorized, Web 2.0 | Tags: #worksm, intranet, Red Sky Vision, social intranet, social media at work, video |
Last Friday, Red Sky Vision launched a video about social media at work. Amazingly, I was asked to be part of it! It’s very well produced and the key strength of it for me is that it’s not about hyping up social media and creating a frenzy. Rather, it’s a well-balanced and calm assessment of the issues and benefits of social media in work – with a particular focus on internal communications. It’s about 15 mins long – so grab a coffee and a chocolate biscuit and take 15!
As well as me, you’ll hear from the following:
- Marco Forgione, IVCA
- Rebecca Richmond, Melcrum
- Stefan Stern, Edelman London
- Helen Dunne, CorpComms magazine
- Neil Gibbons, Communicate magazine
- David Ferrabee, Able and How
- Madeleine Kavanagh, Deutsche Bank
- Livio Hughes, Headshift
- Neville Hobson, Communicator and entrepreneur (from whom I stole this lits of participants – see his blog post).
Enjoy! I’d be interested to know what you think of it …
[If you can't see the embedded video - you can watch it on the Red Sky Vision site]Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 4 so far )
Posted on May 24, 2011. Filed under: digital workplace, intranet, social intranet | Tags: digital workplace, intranet, intranet 2.0, intranet definition, intranet evolution, intranet management, what is an intranet |
Following a lively conversation on the Thought Farmer blog, I was wondering about the relationship between the thing we call the intranet and the digital workplace. Which model below looks right to you?Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 20 so far )
« Previous Entries